Project Overview
- Status:
Complete
Meta-analyses are often considered to be the most reliable source of information when it comes to deciding whether a phenomenon is real, and how strong the effect is. However, large-scale collaborations, such as ManyBabies, often yield different results than published meta-analyses. To better understand how the two ways to collect and analyze large datasets are related (or not), we update the meta-analysis on infant-directed speech preference and subject it to a joint analysis.
Project Leads
-
Martin Zettersten, University of California, San Diego
[email]
-
Christopher M. M. Cox, Aarhus University
[email]
-
Christina Bergmann, University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrück
[email]
-
Maya B. Mathur, Stanford University
[email]
Links
Contributors
list coming soon!
Publication
Zettersten, M.*, Cox, C. M. M.*, Bergmann, C.*, Tsui, A. S. M., Soderstrom, M., Mayor, J., Lundwall, R. A., Lewis, M., Kosie, J. E., Kartushina, N., Fusaroli, R., Frank, M. C., Byers-Heinlein, K., Black, A. K., & Mathur, M. B. (2024). Evidence for infant-directed speech preference is consistent across large-scale, multi-site replication and meta-analysis. Open Mind: Discoveries in Cognitive Science, 8(), 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00134